Use acpi_format_exception() in acpi_evalf() instead of logging numeric
errors.

Also, when ACPICA returns an error, we should not be touching the return
object, as it is invalid.  In debug mode, acpi_evalf() callers would
printk the returned crap (but fortunately, not use it).

Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <h...@hmh.eng.br>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c |    9 +++++----
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c 
b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
index 877a780..da3a70b 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
@@ -605,9 +605,10 @@ static int acpi_evalf(acpi_handle handle,
 
        switch (res_type) {
        case 'd':               /* int */
-               if (res)
+               success = (status == AE_OK &&
+                          out_obj.type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER);
+               if (success && res)
                        *(int *)res = out_obj.integer.value;
-               success = status == AE_OK && out_obj.type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
                break;
        case 'v':               /* void */
                success = status == AE_OK;
@@ -620,8 +621,8 @@ static int acpi_evalf(acpi_handle handle,
        }
 
        if (!success && !quiet)
-               printk(TPACPI_ERR "acpi_evalf(%s, %s, ...) failed: %d\n",
-                      method, fmt0, status);
+               printk(TPACPI_ERR "acpi_evalf(%s, %s, ...) failed: %s\n",
+                      method, fmt0, acpi_format_exception(status));
 
        return success;
 }
-- 
1.7.1


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
ibm-acpi-devel mailing list
ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel

Reply via email to