On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 01:54:43PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote: > So this patch is only as a courtesy to clang and you're not complaining > about things like __builtin() functions, typeof, or a ? : b conditional > operators because clang happens to support them?
That patch removes a disgusting construct; who cares how they'd discovered it? Consider it courtesy to reviewers, clang or no clang... Folks, it's C; no need to bring Pascal misfeatures in, even if gcc happens to accept them. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce. With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
