On Sat, 25 Feb 2017, Christian Kellner wrote:
> @@ -1923,7 +1923,8 @@ enum {  /* hot key scan codes (derived from ACPI DSDT) 
> */
>       TP_ACPI_HOTKEYSCAN_UNK7,
>       TP_ACPI_HOTKEYSCAN_UNK8,
>  
> -     TP_ACPI_HOTKEYSCAN_MUTE2,
> +     TP_ACPI_HOTKEYSCAN_ADAPTIVE_START = 32,
> +     TP_ACPI_HOTKEYSCAN_MUTE2 = 32,
>       TP_ACPI_HOTKEYSCAN_BRIGHTNESS_ZERO,
>       TP_ACPI_HOTKEYSCAN_CLIPPING_TOOL,
>       TP_ACPI_HOTKEYSCAN_CLOUD,

This works, but...

enum {
        TP_ACPI_HOTKEYSCAN_ADAPTIVE_START,
        TP_ACPI_HOTKEYSCAN_MUTE2 = TP_ACPI_HOTKEYSCAN_ADAPTIVE_START,
        TP_ACPI_HOTKEYSCAN_BRIGHTNESS_ZERO,
...
} 

or something to that effect might be better.  Either that or an
compile-time assert that the block boundaries are where we expect them
to be.

Feel free to use formatting tricks with whitespace to make it create
visual blocks in the enum {}  definition, or use comments as spacers...
;-)

> @@ -3657,7 +3658,6 @@ static const int adaptive_keyboard_modes[] = {
>  #define DFR_CHANGE_ROW                       0x101
>  #define DFR_SHOW_QUICKVIEW_ROW               0x102
>  #define FIRST_ADAPTIVE_KEY           0x103
> -#define ADAPTIVE_KEY_OFFSET          0x020
>  
>  /* press Fn key a while second, it will switch to Function Mode. Then
>   * release Fn key, previous mode be restored.
> @@ -3748,12 +3748,13 @@ static bool 
> adaptive_keyboard_hotkey_notify_hotkey(unsigned int scancode)
>       default:
>               if (scancode < FIRST_ADAPTIVE_KEY ||
>                   scancode >= FIRST_ADAPTIVE_KEY + TPACPI_HOTKEY_MAP_LEN -
> -                             ADAPTIVE_KEY_OFFSET) {
> +                             TP_ACPI_HOTKEYSCAN_ADAPTIVE_START) {
>                       pr_info("Unhandled adaptive keyboard key: 0x%x\n",
>                                       scancode);
>                       return false;
>               }
> -             keycode = hotkey_keycode_map[scancode - FIRST_ADAPTIVE_KEY + 
> ADAPTIVE_KEY_OFFSET];
> +             keycode = hotkey_keycode_map[scancode - FIRST_ADAPTIVE_KEY +
> +                                          TP_ACPI_HOTKEYSCAN_ADAPTIVE_START];
>               if (keycode != KEY_RESERVED) {
>                       mutex_lock(&tpacpi_inputdev_send_mutex);
>  
> @@ -3779,7 +3780,7 @@ static bool hotkey_notify_hotkey(const u32 hkey,
>       *ignore_acpi_ev = false;
>  
>       /* HKEY event 0x1001 is scancode 0x00 */
> -     if (scancode > 0 && scancode <= TPACPI_HOTKEY_MAP_LEN) {
> +     if (scancode > 0 && scancode <= TP_ACPI_HOTKEYSCAN_ADAPTIVE_START) {
>               scancode--;
>               if (!(hotkey_source_mask & (1 << scancode))) {
>                       tpacpi_input_send_key_masked(scancode);

Other than that, I like the idea.

-- 
  Henrique Holschuh

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
ibm-acpi-devel mailing list
ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel

Reply via email to