On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <raf...@kernel.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Andy Shevchenko
>> <andy.shevche...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Ognjen Galić <smclt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 16/12/2017, Rafael J. Wysocki <raf...@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I would reorder it as the first patch in the series, then, because the
>>>>> other two are more related to each other.
>>>
>>>> Do I really need now to re-order and re-send the whole patchset for it
>>>> to get merged?
>>>
>>> Through which tree it's supposed to go?
>>
>> Wait, wait.  I haven't commented patches [1,3/3] yet, so no ACKs
>> assumed, please.
>
> I would prefer if you can take it through linux-pm.

No problem.

> Whenever you are okay with the series let me know I would review PDx86 bits.

OK

Thanks,
Rafael

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
ibm-acpi-devel mailing list
ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel

Reply via email to