> If this was code that affected all systems, the impact would be greater > - and it would be much easier to test.
I can follow such a view to some degree. Would you dare to test the deletion of questionable error messages more with any other software components? > As it applies only to Thinkpad systems, Are these models still popular enough in any areas? > far fewer total systems are affected, and it is much harder to > test/verify. Do you care for the suggested transformation patterns (in principle)? > If you feel that is the wrong call, It seems that the usual indication was expressed for change resistance. > you will need to present convincing evidence to Henrique that > this is worth the risk. Which risks have you got in mind for this small adjustment? > … - or that it would be worth the effort. Can a bit of “software fine-tuning” become useful also here? Regards, Markus ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
