On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 6:32 PM, Ognjen Galić <smclt...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 10:07:20AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 6:21 PM, Andy Shevchenko >> <andy.shevche...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Ognjen Galić <smclt...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> Do you guys want me to send in another revision of the patch with some >> >> documentation on the sysfs API? >> > >> > I noticed I didn't apply it because of some pending changes discussed, >> > perhaps this one above. >> > >> > So, definitely please send a new version which addresses comments. >> >> No, it actually has been applied already. > > And also, how is it applied if it does not apply to 4.16-rc2 anymore? > Do you need a new revision that solves the apply conflicts? > Do you need a new revision that addresses the documentation? > Did you apply it earlier than 4.16-rc2? > When did you apply it? > Did you apply it at all?
Yes, I did, on top of 4.16-rc2, and I might have rebased it a bit. Please see linux-next and I will expose the acpi-battery branch containing this series later today and tomorrow. >> What is needed is a follow-up patch, but I'll write on that later. Please see my previous message in this thread regarding the above. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ ibm-acpi-devel mailing list ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel
