Hi Yves-Alexis,

On Fri, 2018-09-07T13:41+0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-08-06 at 16:24 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 1:24 AM, Thomas Weißschuh <li...@weissschuh.net> 
> > wrote:
> > > The struct containing the supported operations for all batteries is
> > > being zeroed on each battery probe.  This prevents all other batteries
> > > except the lastly probed one from being configured.
> > 
> > You forgot to include subsystem maintainers along with driver maintainer.
> > 
> > I pushed this to my review and testing queue, meanwhile I would wait
> > for Ack from Henrique.
> 
> was this included in any tree and is it on route to Linus somehow?

This is on track to be released in 4.19.

> My ThinkPad X250 has two batteries and I can only configure threshold on BAT0,
> and I guess it's because of this, so it'd be nice to have it fixed (and maybe
> backported to relevant stable kernels).

As far as I know only changes that fix behaviour that worked before are
eligible for stable. As this specific functionality never worked before I
figured it would be moot to also send it to stable.

(If it is fine to send stuff like this to stable, we could try, though)

Thomas


_______________________________________________
ibm-acpi-devel mailing list
ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel

Reply via email to