Hi

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Barnabás Pőcze <po...@protonmail.com>
>Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2021 5:43 AM
>To: Nitin Joshi <nitjo...@gmail.com>
>Cc: hdego...@redhat.com; ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; platform-
>driver-...@vger.kernel.org; Nitin Joshi1 <njos...@lenovo.com>; Mark RH
>Pearson <markpear...@lenovo.com>
>Subject: [External] Re: [PATCH 2/2] platorm/x86: thinkpad_acpi: sysfs
>interface to interface to get wwan antenna type
>
>Hi
>
>
>2021. február 12., péntek 6:58 keltezéssel, Nitin Joshi írta:
>
>> [...]
>> +/* sysfs wwan antenna type entry */
>> +static ssize_t wwan_antenna_type_show(struct device *dev,
>> +                            struct device_attribute *attr,
>> +                            char *buf)
>> +{
>> +    switch (wwan_antennatype) {
>> +    case 1:
>> +            return sysfs_emit(buf, "type a\n");
>> +    case 2:
>> +            return sysfs_emit(buf, "type b\n");
>> +    default:
>> +            return sysfs_emit(buf, "unknown type\n");
>
>I feel like returning -ENODATA would be more appropriate here. Or maybe
>you could choose not to create the attribute if the antenna type is unknown.
>And I'm not sure if the "type" prefix is necessary. I believe the name of the
>attribute 'wwan_antenna_type'
Ack . I will check it. 
Regarding prefix, it's not so necessary but let me keep "type" prefix.
   
>already implies that the content will describe a type. Furthermore, I think you
>could omit the `has_antennatype` variable altogether, storing only
>`wwan_antennatype` is enough.
Ack . I will check it
>
>
>> +    }
>> +}
>> +
>>  static ssize_t wlan_tx_strength_reduce_store(struct device *dev,
>>                              struct device_attribute *attr,
>>                              const char *buf, size_t count)
>> @@ -10076,24 +10114,29 @@ static ssize_t
>wlan_tx_strength_reduce_store(struct device *dev,
>>      }
>>
>>      sysfs_notify(&tpacpi_pdev->dev.kobj, NULL,
>> "wlan_tx_strength_reduce");
>> +
>
>If you want the empty line here, I think you should place it in the previous
>patch.
Ack . I will remove it.
>
>
>>      return count;
>>  }
>>  static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(wlan_tx_strength_reduce);
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(wwan_antenna_type);
>>
>>  static int tpacpi_dprc_init(struct ibm_init_struct *iibm)  {
>> -    int wlantx_err, err;
>> +    int wlantx_err, wwanantenna_err, err;
>>
>>      wlantx_err = get_wlan_state(&has_wlantxreduce, &wlan_txreduce);
>> +    wwanantenna_err = get_wwan_antenna(&has_antennatype,
>&wwan_antennatype);
>>      /*
>>       * If support isn't available (ENODEV) for both devices then quit, but
>>       * don't return an error.
>>       */
>> -    if (wlantx_err == -ENODEV)
>> +    if ((wlantx_err == -ENODEV) && (wwanantenna_err == -ENODEV))
>>              return 0;
>>      /* Otherwise, if there was an error return it */
>>      if (wlantx_err && (wlantx_err != -ENODEV))
>>              return wlantx_err;
>> +    if (wwanantenna_err && (wwanantenna_err != -ENODEV))
>> +            return wwanantenna_err;
>>
>>      if (has_wlantxreduce) {
>>              err = sysfs_create_file(&tpacpi_pdev->dev.kobj,
>> @@ -10101,6 +10144,12 @@ static int tpacpi_dprc_init(struct
>ibm_init_struct *iibm)
>>              if (err)
>>                      return err;
>>      }
>> +
>> +    if (has_antennatype) {
>> +            err = sysfs_create_file(&tpacpi_pdev->dev.kobj,
>&dev_attr_wwan_antenna_type.attr);
>> +            if (err)
>> +                    return err;
>> +    }
>>      return 0;
>>  }
>> [...]
>
>
>Regards,
>Barnabás Pőcze

Thanks & regards,
Nitin Joshi 

_______________________________________________
ibm-acpi-devel mailing list
ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ibm-acpi-devel

Reply via email to