In a recent note, Ray Mullins said: > Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 15:49:45 -0700 > > I vote for doing it - but not 32767 - maybe 1022 or something like that. I > have found that the limitations of PARM are hit by compiler invocations, > especially as the options became verbose over the years. > Why would the increasing verbosity of options motivate you to suggest any limitation other than the largest possible? Do you simply want to reserve room for future expansion?
-- gil -- StorageTek INFORMATION made POWERFUL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
