256 seems WAY to small to me - for such things as the LE ENVAR run-time option.
(In fact, just trying to pass all the LE run-time options that one MIGHT want to override - without a CEEUOPT makes me question 4096) "Ed Gould" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > on 5/13/05 7:13 AM, Bob Shannon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > -------SNIP------------------------------------ > > > Seriously, we're talking about a parameter. I agree that 256 bytes ought > > to be sufficient. > > > > Bob, > > I sort of agree with you BUT....... I have gotten more JCL errors than at > any time when I was trying to get the rules of multiple JCL statements when > passing parm info.. I know once you learn you will never forget but trying > to teach someone over the phone at 0300 is not pretty:( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
