On Tue, 24 May 2005 11:52:35 -0500 Bill Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

:>z/VSE recognized the "problem" and introduced the new "CEE5PRML" callable
:>service, see:

:>  http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/fl2pre05/3.17 

300 character limit.

:>IBM has indicated at previous SHARE meetings that the requirement

:>  SSLNGC0313586:  Enhance CEE3PRM Callable Service  

:>will me "met" in a "timely" manner - even though they have NOT yet marked it
:>as "accepted". (It is still in status "RC".)  I would expect it to be
:>"resolved" in a semi-compatible way with the current VSE solution.
:>
:>"Ray Mullins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
:>news:<!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAn_oqCAYieUWz_YYE6QkUgMK
:>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
:>> > -----Original Message-----
:>> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
:>> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Comstock
:>> > Sent: Tuesday 24 May 2005 07:51
 
:>> > What's really wierd is that LE has a callable service for 
:>> > obtaining the JCL parm value and it limits the return string 
:>> > to 80 characters!
 
:>> If the lengthening of PARM does go through, then I hope that all of IBM MF
:>> is tasked to check for restrictions like this.

:>> I wonder what LE for z/VSE does in this area.  z/VSE has had PARMs > 100
:>> characters for a long time.

--
Binyamin Dissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel


Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to