On Tue, 24 May 2005 14:55:02 -0700, Jeff Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I also recommend you loose version 5. You must have been incredibly >lucky to not have run into 'some' PDF files that version 5 can't handle. I guess you weren't paying close attention to what I said. It's not what *I* want, it's what is dictated to be on the standard desktop image. But as I also said, I personally have the authority to get around that restriction, but not everyone does and there is a push to take that authority away with the next image roll out. >It 'may' open them, but some PDF files now take advantage of >capabilities that version 5 simply cannot handle. I don't know if I've >run into this reading IBM documentation, but I certainly have for other >things. > >Needs vs. wants. Adobe 5 works fine. Well unless I could prove that there was documentation only readable by a acrobat reader above V5, then I wouldn't have a good case to force the desktop support to upgrade me. That is all I meant. So far, I've not run across that issue (yet) doing "my job". I would also think a vendor would be careful in creating documentation that could not even be opened/read by Adobe 5, but perhaps that is giving them too much credit. Cheers, Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems Programming expert at http://Search390.com/ateExperts/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
