In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 05/26/2005
at 08:08 PM, ibm-main <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Mmmm - I'm surprised we haven't had some enlightened contributor
>suggesting that DASD is cheap, so just forget about USI, and throw
>page datasets at it.
Why? The issue for below the line storage is not and never was DASD.
It doesn't matter how large or numerous your local paging data sets
are; you'll never have more than 16 MiB below the line and 2 GiB below
the bar, minus system overhead.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
