On Tue, 31 May 2005 14:02:30 -0400, Dave Thorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>We have begun setting up a new customer's LPARs, etc, and since we're
>bringing them into our sysplex I'm integrating their WLM specs into our
>existing one.
>
>I activated it last week on the customer system.  To my surprise, started
>tasks all seemed to go to the default STC service class.  This sems to be
>happening across the board.  I activated the same policy on our sandbox
>LPAR and everything seemed to go to the right place.
>
>They were at OS/390 2.10, and were in Goal Mode, but the systems we're
>building here are z/OS 1.4.  I asked the sysprogs if the software levels
>are identical to our existing ones yet , and was told not completely, but
>that still doesn't seem to click with me.  This is (I think) fairly basic.
>This customer does EVERYTHING with automation but I can't see that entering
>into it either.
>
>A 'D WLM' command on their system shows a functionality level of 008, while
>we are at 011.  And when I flip them to our policy, the 011 shows up as
>expected.
>
>Anyone have any ideas?  Never saw this before.
>

Hard to say without IEE-EYE-BALL.  Assuming all the compatibility
maintenance is on their 2.10 system, I don't think the WLM levels
are an issue.  Perhaps some misplaced SPM rule?  If you want to
send me a printout off-list of the policy you activiated on their
system, perhaps a second set of eyes will catch something.

I assume you moved the policy to their system via reading a saved
definition PDS.  Did you get any errors reading the definition?

Regards,

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Programming expert at http://Search390.com/ateExperts/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to