Just understand that with DDCONS(NO), you will generate more SMF records for each Task/Job. This could cause more back-end processing for MXG or MICS or your archival process. But this is probably preferred.
I've been recommending NO since it first became available. I'd rather the backend take more time, than the shutdown process. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Schiradin,Roland HG-Dir itb-db/dc Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 SYSN 2:09 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: DDCONS We use DDCONS(NO). Helps to shutdown DB2 faster which we do only during IPL (aprox. 5 times a year) and maintenance (aprox. 3 times a year) For our SAP-DB2 sub-system it's a pain using DDCONS(YES) Roland -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Mendelson, Eric Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Mai 2005 21:30 An: [email protected] Betreff: DDCONS What is the ramifications of ddcons in SMF. We have used the default of YES. How many shops have set ddcons to no ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
