Eric Bielefeld wrote:
We still use UADS. All new userids being set up in the last 5 or so years
go into RACF, but we have never converted all of the old ids from uads.
That leaves me as the only person at our shop who understands uads, and I
can't remember as well. (I do know where to look though).
In our case, I doubt if I will ever convert uads, as our conversion away
from the mainframe is slated for this Thanksgiving. All changes have been
frozen unless absolutely necessary.
From this discussion thread and also from my own experience with
customers, my impression is that while very few RACF installations are
still using UADS, the percentage of TopSecret installations using UADS
is much higher. Is this impression wrong? If not, what might be the
reason for this?
--
Ulrich Boche
SVA GmbH, Germany
IBM Premier Business Partner
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
