On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 07:06:00 +0200, Barbara Nitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>OA12196 is also not trackable in AST. ;-( > >True. I'll let you know when the ptf is available. You can open an ETR with >IBM and request subscription to the apar. > >IBM won't even tell me why they give me recommendations that are not >explained at all. And *I know* that there is a gaping hole (I found it in >the non-oco control blocks - and I have to assume that logon to one console >right after IPL for the first time destroys the security environment of >another, so that all commands routed in a sysplex issued from that other >console will be accepted as if logon were not required). > >Also I wonder: I was told that neither the apar text nor the resolution are >shown in the ++ptf. The thing will probably be marked so that it should be >installed first chance. Are all of you installing ptfs just on IBM's say-so >without knowing why? We normally don't do that... > >Best regards, Barbara > Isn't this S.O.P. for any integrity / security APARs? I guess we just don't get them (or notice them) often enough so it seems a little unusual when you do. Unlike M$SOFT where you get about 10 or more of these a month. :-) Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems Programming expert at http://Search390.com/ateExperts/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
