>> So, I ask,  is I/O tuning still possible, or even necessary?
>> ..
>> I believe you can run them quite high, well over 50%.
>> Since (the simple equation), the odds of all four being busy is:
>>
>> 5 ** 4 = .125
>>
>> Or 12.5% of the time there would be no channel busy.
>> Of course, you have to calculate the 'Relative Path Busy', since your own
>I/O doesn't count.
>> But, I did say 'simple'.
>>
>
>Beware: .5 **4 = 0.0625, 6% of the time no path is busy.
>It also means that (1-.5) ** 4 = 0.0625 6% if the time all paths are busy
>and you will encounter delays and this sounds a little high to me.
>
>.5 ** 6 = 1.5% all paths busy
>.6 ** 8 = 1.6% all paths busy
>

I/O tuning is still alive, especially in DASD replication projects.
However, it takes time and practice to build I/O tuning skills.

The formula (Utilization ** 4) just doesn't work. It's not even close. The
math is much more complex, and we can't simplify some things. It could make
a huge difference. To make the story short, for 4 paths at 50%, "the
probability of all busy" is approx 17%.

As I said, it takes time. But the effort can certainly pay off.

Regards,
Robert Hamilton

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to