Ted, No argument with you that your problem was on the checkpoint. But the methods I included all indirectly reduce the checkpoint activity that occurs while a system holds the checkpoint. This in turn would allow other requests that update the checkpoint to complete before the system lets go of the checkpoint.
I'd still like to see the RMF data if you have it. Ron > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL > Sent: Sunday, 19 June 2005 8:00 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: DR and JES2 Spool/Checkpoint and SRDF/Replicate > > ... > Personally, unless customers are running GDPS/PPRC I don't see the sense > in > running Synchronous > ... > We were a GDPS shop. > > PS: > SPOOL was never the problem. > If you looked at my posts, you would see I always said checkpoint. > -teD > (The secret to success is sincerity. > If you can fake that, > you've got it made!) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
