Sorry Peter, you have been told an untruth -- the error is a WARNING and generates RC=4, which is an unacceptable RC for some automated software maintenance systems that insist all compiles must have RC=0 for production.
Is it APARable for the RC=4? I'd accept an #ifdef/#endif that tested the version of the compiler if that's what it takes, but RC=4 is not acceptable. Peter -----Original Message----- From: Peter Relson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 7:15 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Name/Token Services in COBOL? IEANTC Since the z/OS 1.4 level of C does not support AMODE 64 program calls, it is basically irrelvant what IEANTC contains, since (again, just what I'm told) the only ramification is an informational message (the compile completes with completion code 0). So while it is not ideal, it is not causing any problems. There is no prohibition against putting uplevel function into downlevel macros; that is a packaging issue. If the ramifications are as I stated, I would say that this would not be APARable. If it is causing harm, that is a different story. Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design _ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
