In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/27/2005
at 05:06 AM, Dave Cartwright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Oh yes. Our Net Nanny is VERY strict, no possibility of smut is
>allowed.
IME, there's a far higher chance of getting smut from e-mail than from
Usenet. If they're worried about smut, they'd do far better to start
blocking traffic from known spam sources instead of making an ignorant
assumption[1] that smut=Usenet or smut=web.
[1] You'd have to put it more diplomatically if you discussed it with
your management ;-)
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
