In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 06/29/2005
at 04:31 PM, "Farley, Peter x23353" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Agreed. What it *does* say, though, is the answer to the question
>originally raised about not being able to define arbitrary areas of
>memory as programs. There's no *documented* way to do it,
The OP never asked that it be documented. Now, I can see good reasons
to stick to GUPI, but he's already violated that by using a LOAD in
CICS.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
