See my earlier reply to Mr. Richards for the ASSumptions behind that statement.
Peter -----Original Message----- From: Ted MacNEIL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 6:14 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: IBM VSAM Statistics are often Bogus ... Just because they are not written when something BAD happens is NOT a reason to see them as invalid or useless. ... I don't get it! Invalid data is invalid data! We make enough bad decisions with valid data. How can you say that with a straight face? _ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
