In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 07/05/2005
at 09:30 AM, "Jousma, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>One of my team mates is working up a new IODF. At our D/R site we
>have Both production workload(live data), replicated data(for D/R,
>from other site), and BCV's(for D/R testing). Because of this, the
>IODF for this datacenter has run out of available ranges for UCB's.
That doesn't make any sense. Are you sure that you don't mean run out
of available ranges for CHPID's?
>My team mate was playing around in HCD, and figured out that he could
>define the SAME UCB address to a different CU as long as it was not
>part of the same Channel Sub system group.
Assuming that you mean CHPID, it must be unique within an IODF. Also,
the is no connection between the CHPID and the CU except what you
define in the IOCDS; mapping consecutive addresses to consecutive
addresses is just a useful convention that helps keep track of things.
Of course, at a D/R site you probably have to use a vendor-supplied
IOCDS.
>The thought process would be that the D/R test system needs no
>access to Any other disk.
Then use a separate IODF that only refers to what you need.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
