In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 07/12/2005
at 07:27 AM, Martin Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Why hasn't IBM come out with a JCL option that says, "There is no
>program, just set return code zero?" It could avoid all the setup
>for calling IEFBR14 - LOAD, DELETE, RB setup, save area, recovery,
>etc.
If it ain't broke don't fix it? That would introduce new potentiality
for errors and would increase the overhead for everything other than
IEFBR14. How expensive is one ATTACH and how much are you willing to
pay to get rid of it?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
