In a recent note, Rolf Ernst said: > Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 12:43:41 -0500 > > That's because TSO spawns a subtask for every command. There is probably > little you can do about it besides VLF. > Gee, hasn't IBM heard that attached tasks can run concurrently?
> Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: > > >In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 07/12/2005 > > at 10:34 AM, Paul Gilmartin <[log in to unmask]> said: > > > >>I find that when I go to ISPF 3.4 and type 'D' before a few dozen > >>data set names, my terminal is unavailable for an uncomfortably long > >>time during processing. > > > >That ties into the issue of allowing multiple sessions for the same > >userid. A restructuring of TSO[1] to support multiple legacy (not > >Unix) address spaces could solve your problem. > > > >[1] Including VTIOC. > Gee, I wish I had thought of that. Maybe I'll suggest it to IBM! And the additional PITA is that I type 'D' in front of a few dozen data set names, ENTER, respond to the confirmation with "Don't ask!?" and go for coffee. I come back. Oops! A third of the way down the list is a VSAM data set; it prompts me regardless! Similarly for in use, or already deleted by another process. I wish it would do the ones it can, and only after all those ask me about the rest; a Continue After Failure option. -- gil -- StorageTek INFORMATION made POWERFUL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
