In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 07/19/2005
at 10:48 AM, David Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Also: the Windows code would likely have to be stripped out.
Which Windows code? The "for Windows" version, which didn't include[1]
any windoze code, or the full function version, which did. FWIW, I've
never wanted to run winapps on my OS/2 system.
>But the Workplace Shell was an interesting hack,
Yes! I'd love to see an equivalent in Linux.
[1] That WINOS2 would run windoze 3.1 applications if you had an
existing copy of windoze. The name was confusing because it was
the package of choice for those that did *not* want to run windoze
applications.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
