In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 07/22/2005
at 09:54 AM, Jay Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Because TCAM did. Now, as to why they made that choice for TCAM...
Well, at least these days you can still issue a HALT after the STOP
that you shouldn't have issued. There was a time when the only effect
of the STOP was to cause the HALT to be rejected.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
