On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:31:05 EDT, Ed Finnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Learned that in 1st grade, been trying to rectify it ever since. >The only authoritative statements that I think I've made. Gaming >PCs cost more and have more horsepower, can still order with >DOS or XP gave you a link to the Systemax Warbird, the tigerdirect.com site >has 27 hits for No-OS. I've got a box of 3.5" >diskettes that have stuff from Flight simulator to Donkey Kong that >ran on an XT and delighted the kids. My current P4 won't read them >'cause they're 256k. Lastly, gaming sites are virus prone even >with current Norton Suite 2005.
How about this statement: On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:55:40 EDT, Ed Finnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Don't think we'll see many converts unless they can offer a gaming >option, but the gamers are far out in front(as usual). The high >end games now run under DOS and manage the graphics and sound >themselves. It seem rather strange to me that you would omit the statement that started this whole issue. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
