Ted, I agree that this is a perfectly sound option in a system that has little to no paging. However, the point that Ron is making (and I agree with) is that for those systems that are memory constrained, and, as such incur paging, that having a PLPA page-in blocked by common paging operations, particulary page-out operations, could have an impact on system performance. Again, on non memory constrained systems, this isn't a major issue. Wayne Driscoll Product Developer Western Metal Supply NOTE: All opinions are strictly my own.
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 7:00 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: ILR005E PLPA PAGE DATA SET FULL ... I used to allocate a one clinde PLPA and let COMMON have the rest of the volume; I believe that to still be a sound option. ... At least one person agrees with me. -teD In God we Trust! All others bring data! -- W. Edwards Deming ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
