We run TMSPTRS "unattended" so its performance was never of interest. We did observe a noticeable improvement in TMSDATA but that is just another example of simple sequential access.
"Bielskie, Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:But did you have a performance improvement using the CA-1 utilities such as TMSPTRS? CA has indicated to us that there will be little, if any improvement in performance for these utilities. I'd be interested to know if the utilities got a perf boost. Thanks, Steve -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Barry Schwarz Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 4:31 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: CA-1: blocked TMC / Audit? I run some SAS and ICETOOL scripts against the TMC and blocking helped performance significantly. ============================================================================== Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://www.csfb.com/legal_terms/disclaimer_external_email.shtml ============================================================================== ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html --------------------------------- Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
