In a recent note, Kurt Quackenbush said: > Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 09:15:48 -0400 > > UCLIN is not involved... the doc for message GIM52801E is misleading. > This results from reusing a message and missing the appropriate doc > updates. I'll ensure a future instance of the book is corrected. > Thanks. Again, I'll state that GIM52801T is a better choice to reuse than GIM52801E, and would involve a less drastic doc update, with less IF GIMSMP THEN ... ELSE IF GIMAPI ... logic in the text. GIM52801E is clearly addressed to UCLIN errors and is best left that way, while GIM52801T addresses parameter errors and could more easily be generalized.
> > .. no mention of truncating excess characters from the lowest-level > > Quite simply I believe it is a bug. Unless you feel strongly and > require an APAR, I'll see what I can do to fix it in a future release of > SMP/E. > Thanks. Would a PMR with a suggestion of FIN APAR increase or decrease your paperwork? Thanks again, gil -- StorageTek INFORMATION made POWERFUL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
