In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 07/29/2005
at 07:23 AM, Peter Relson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>There was no change in this processing aside from, actually,
>detecting some of the additional cases and issuing even more messages
>(some of these messages might alert you that LLA will not function
>properly, for example).
Do you leave enough information in storage for a program to identify
the missing libraries? If not, how difficult would it be to retain
the data? How difficult would it be to provide a diagnostic utility or
command to display information on missing linklist libraries? This
looks like a good candidate for a requirement.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
