In a recent note, Mark Zelden said: > Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:55:25 -0500 > > On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 13:23:44 -0700, Edward E. Jaffe > <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > >Paul Gilmartin wrote: > > > >>I wondered about the value of PDSE here. Alas, however, our > >>test systems exceed in number and span of releases both limits > >>for SYSPLEX. Using PDSE would aggravate the ENQ logjam. > > > >Just the opposite should be true. It sounds like you're *already* > >sharing a single ISPF profile data set without serialization. > > It also sounds like he may be sharing between sysplexes (via MII)? > If that's true, then for sure he wouldn't want to use PDSE. > > Paul, are you sharing between sysplexes? > Note my earliest update above.
Thanks, gil -- StorageTek INFORMATION made POWERFUL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
