"the first centralized security system, Customer Information Control System
(CICS), was introduced on the S/390."

This is news to me.  I always thought CICS was an online transaction system
which was introduced on the S/370 or even earlier.  JC, feel free to chime
in.

Regards,
John Kalinich
Computer Sciences Corp



                                                                                
                          
                      Timothy Sipples                                           
                          
                      <timothy.sipples         To:      [email protected]    
                          
                      @US.IBM.COM>             cc:                              
                          
                      Sent by: IBM             Subject: Article: The True Value 
of Mainframe Security     
                      Mainframe                                                 
                          
                      Discussion List                                           
                          
                      <IBM-MAIN                                                 
                          
                                                                                
                          
                                                                                
                          
                      08/31/2005 11:49                                          
                          
                      AM                                                        
                          
                      Please respond                                            
                          
                      to IBM Mainframe                                          
                          
                      Discussion List                                           
                          
                                                                                
                          




This link probably won't fit on one line, but it's an excellent article
IMHO:

http://www.eservercomputing.com/ME2/Audiences/dirmod.asp?sid=BCF4DE820EA64A858FB46EECB7C00BB4&nm=&type=Publishing&mod=Publications%3A%3AArticle&mid=8F3A7027421841978F18BE895F87F791&AudID=174DB902288C4970A30C71C9427313A7&tier=4&id=64AE6EE59AA34C67B2A5CD23CE07D1D3



I guess you could say, without exaggeration, that the cost to (the company
mentioned) of *not* having mainframe QoS is $2.75+ billion.  (It's public
knowledge that they didn't have a mainframe.)  Or, more precisely, the odds
of a $2.75+ billion loss would have been a whole lot lower, one would
think.

- - - - -
Timothy F. Sipples
Consulting Enterprise Software Architect
IBM Americas zSeries/z9 Software
NEW Phone: +1 312 529 1612
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP key available.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to