>>Mark Zelden wrote: >> >>>SMS control is not a requirement for using dynamic dump allocation. >> >>Not a requirement, but very, very useful. We use SMS to allocate our >>dumps as extended sequential data sets (with compression) in a storage >>group of large (60K cyl) volumes and they get migrated to level 1 almost >>right away. >>
Mark, I hope you're doing well. I've been using SMS for Dump datasets very succesfully but without using some of the SMS features. I read about stripping, compress and extended format but I've never read about multivol capability. Is there any sense to think in multivol if we use stripping?. What would be the pros and cons of each implementation?. Thanks in advance, Giovanni ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
