In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/31/2005
at 11:15 PM, "Joel C. Ewing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>You have an implicit assumption here that the only significant
>changes from release to release are syntactical in nature.
No, just that those changes are easy to catch and worth dealing with.
>I would fear that a migration approach that focuses on COBOL
>programs that fail compilation may give you a false sense of
>security.
Most shops already have that :-(
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
