On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 08:40 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote: > NUM OFF certainly seems to me the more comfortable solution:
Heretofore we have wrapped control statements in an IEBGENER step, stripping out columns 73-80. Then if somebody (re)sequences the member, we don't care much. The semicolon thing is news to us. Thanks, Ben. -- David Andrews A. Duda and Sons, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
