In my experience with REXX, especially as it translates between EBCDIC and ASCII, I've seen negation translated to "^". The boolean AND is represented as "&".
Lance J. ---- Original message ---- >Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 08:24:33 -0300 >From: "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: REXX Question >To: [email protected] > >In ><!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA5wj89uWCQUCKM3bb1qg+DMKAAAAQAAAAsn2x5Gg8F0y/[EMAIL > PROTECTED]>, >on 09/11/2005 > at 03:49 PM, "Lance D. Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >said: > >>The ^ symbol is the negation sign. An alternative to this is using >>\. > >No; the ^ symbol is the And sign, but an early version of ASCII had ^ >and ¬ at the same code point. It was only one of several such >inexcusable pairings. > >-- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT > ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> >We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. >(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO >Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
