In a recent note, Binyamin Dissen said: > Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 21:24:43 +0300 > > JCL is not TSO. > I stand corrected. I guess that shows I make the preponderance of my mistakes using DYNALLOC rather than JCL.
Dammit! Why can't IBM report the same error with the same message and the same code in any two different contexts? Don't they believe in reusable code, or at reusable messages? -- gil -- StorageTek INFORMATION made POWERFUL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
