D TCPIP,,N,CONN,MAX=10000 gives :

"37 of 239 records"

Surely the 'MAX' parameter here is a function of the TCPIP code that
responds to the operator command - MXI has no effect on it.

I get this problem when issuing commands from SDSF, TSO CONSOLE, the
master console or MXI.

I really do not think this is an MXI problem.

Rob Scott
www.rs.com


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe
Sent: 23 September 2005 15:52
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: MXI 4.3

On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 05:07:55 -0400, Rob Scott
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>...
>I tried adding the "MAX=10000" for good measure - but that did not make
>any difference.
>...

None?  When I try it with MAX the numbers still don't agree, but they
are
much closer.  Close enough that I expect a miscount on IBM's part -
probably because of a rapidly chaning number of connections.  Displays
of more static things (like PORTList) have an accurate count.

The default MAX for 1.4 & 1.6 is 100 but it sounds like it was 50 back
on
2.10.

>I don't think this is a problem with MXI as I can re-create this
problem
>by entering the command at the z/OS master console.
>...

I'm not so sure.  If you're letting MAX default you're defintely going
to truncate data.  I'd put in a large MAX if I were you.)  Is that
something we can do in MXI?)  The max MAX in 1.4 is 56535.

Pat O'Keefe

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to