In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 09/25/2005
at 01:45 PM, Leonard Woren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>(Of course you can support more users on Wylbur than on TSO ISPF --
>it takes 5 times as long to get your work done using something as
>primitive as Wylbur, so the machine doesn't get loaded up with all
>those pesky jobs.) (Don't bother flaming me for this, I'm immune.
>Wylbur was a really advanced concept -- in 1965.)
Wylbur is in some respects still superior to TSO EDIT and ISPF/PDF
EDIT. That's true even for the old free versions, and it's even more
true for the newer versions, e.g., NIH and SuperWylbur. When I had
access to SuperWylbur I used it for functionality, not for performance
or because of local policy.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
