In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 09/27/2005
at 07:05 AM, Barbara Nitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Greg, in this case I believe that just about everyone using GFS
>traces would be greatful for an incomplete solution. If the amount of
>data could get reduced to the non-trivial cases that you mentioned
>above, that would be a great help already. Myself, I am perfectly
>willing to check the entries of a GFS trace that are left when the
>fully matching pairs have been eliminated. Any chance that this could
>be made available by IBM (similar to Jims verbx dmpwrite before I
>nagged you enough to make it a full command :-) ?)
I see similar requirements for GTF and LOGREC; it would be very
helpful if there were a means to request formatting only of records
meeting specified criteria.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
