Max, I am going to use the IBM reason, "It depends...". WLM is relative to what your other goals are set to. It also depend on what importance you set the velocity go to. A high velocity with and importance of 1 will react a lot diffenently than a high velocity goal and an importance of 5.
In the situation you stated the goal was designed to never be met so for the most part will get the resources it needs. Is this a good thing? Again, it depends. IMHO a high velocity goal is not a good thing, but again it depends on your other goals. Thanks, Fletch -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Max Scarpa Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 8:25 AM To: [email protected] Subject: A quick question about velocity goals set high Estimeed lister I'm in a shop were I see for some subsystems (CICS,CONTROM etc) a very high velocity goal, that is 90%. PIs range from 1.4 to > 2 and it NEVER reaches 1 nor it's below 1. I read some pepres that a very high velocity goal (>80%) is not good if not useless and infact in my previous shop in some CICS we lowered our goals without any delay in response time. Is still bad to put velocity goals higher than 80% ? In IMHO it is. Thank you in advance Max Scarpa ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
