Well, may be, but all datasets were allocated with disposition = SHARE... What does it have to do with SMS?
ITschak On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Martin Kline <martin.kl...@yrcw.com> wrote: > Is the fifth data set SMS managed like the first four? > > >I looked (programmatic) into JESYSMSG file. A ddname defined in JCL (not > >dynamically allocated) concatenates 5 datasets. The first 4 datasets > >reported as retained by msgIGD104I. The last dataset was reported as KEPT > >by message IEF285I. All datasets are defined in the master catalog with > >same devtype. Another concatenating DD is reported as the first dataset by > >IEF285I and the rest by IGD104I. > > >Any reason for MVS to report with different messages on datasets that are > >allocated on the same volume and cataloged in the mastcat? > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
