I would suggest sending a e-mail to innovation technical support...they'd probably have it resolved in a couple minutes.
We just migrated from 9840A's to TS1130's (running in TS1120 mode) and our FDRABR full backups of 300 volumes changed from 6 1/2 hours to 1 hour 20 minutes. Went from using 12 tapes to 2 tapes. When our DR site can handle TS1130's, I bet it will improve even more! -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Daniel McLaughlin Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 7:42 AM To: [email protected] Subject: FDR Dilemnas We got a couple of 3592 drives in specifically to do full volume backups for DR. Boss said objective is to get our 830 DASD dumped to two tapes, and if it's fast enough do it nightly. Started messing around with our homegrown code and set up FDR/DSF for 155 volumes per tape just to check time and usage. Sparks flew and we got several 513-04 abends, but the job kept trucking. Smoke billowed as it hit my generated DISK card(s) that commenced with DISKAA or TAPEAA that caused a U888 - DD card name cannot exceed 5 characters. 513-04 may be the result of TAPE11 or TAPE22 being used because it's reserved for duplication, IIRC, (and that just flashed into my brain.) The objective is to stay with FDR because we own it. No money for other third party solutions. I'm thinking FDRABR? Open to suggestions....think I'm on the right track. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
