I have no idea how to change the COBOL source code to accomplish my suggestion. 
 Assuming there is no easy way, then if the module has a patch area, he can zap 
the load module with the necessary changes.  Then test the change for an 
improvement in performance.  If there is an improvement, he can complain to 
whatever vendor supplied him with his COBOL compiler.

Bill Fairchild

Software Developer 
Rocket Software
275 Grove Street * Newton, MA 02466-2272 * USA
Tel: +1.617.614.4503 * Mobile: +1.508.341.1715
Email: [email protected] 
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Joel Wolpert
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 4:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: z10 and overlapping/destructive moves

Since he is trying to tune a COBOL program how would he accomplish this.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Fairchild" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 5:31 PM
Subject: Re: z10 and overlapping/destructive moves


> It certainly can't hurt to change the MVI/MVC to a single instruction:
>     MVC   254(3,120),=120c' '
> And, if possible, align the 120c' ' on at least a double word boundary.
>
> Bill Fairchild

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to