Bill Klein wrote:
*JUST* on the issue of the Binder API requiring the LE run-time, I have a
question for you (WB)
Were your discussions with "STL" done before or after "Metal-C" became
available? It would seem to me (and I certainly could be ENTIRELY wrong on
this), that a SHARE requirement to provide a "Metal-C" (no LE library
required) version of the Binder API *might* receive a positive IBM response
NOW. While asking for a "no LE version" of the Binder API *before* Metal-C
was available received a negative response.
As I have said before, I just don't see the "harm" in creating a SHARE
requirement for this (or any other Binder "enhancement"). Occassionally
(not all that often) IBM does provide solutions for SHARE requirements where
"similar" individual site marketting requests get rejected.
"William H. Blair" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>...
Just to keep from loosing some perspective - Dignus' Systems/C
has been available for some time... one might imagine someone
choosing that for an implementation before Metal-C was available.
Metal-C seems to be adopting many of Systems/C features as it
evolves...
- Dave Rivers -
--
[email protected] Work: (919) 676-0847
Get your mainframe programming tools at http://www.dignus.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
