Nice :-)) Should we now raise requirements to improve IBM quality? The real problem is how to detect in the assembler source if a given PTF was applied or not. For IEFSSSA I can do such a check but not for IGDSGCL.
Roland -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clark Morris Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 7:38 PM To: [email protected] Subject: (fwd) RE: IBM-Macros wrong Should someone submit a requirement that IBM provide an automated process to convert PLX macros to Assembler, COBOL, PL1, C/C++ and maybe JAVA. This might eliminate the problem of bad equates and other missed translations. On 27 Sep 2005 14:54:31 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Schiradin,Roland HG-Dir itb-db/dc) wrote: >APAR OA13568 for IGDSGCL and IEFSSSA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
