I was able to experiment with one of our production FTP jobs. Specifying REPLACE or not specifying it had the same result - a new generation was created. (In my test, the data sets were SMS-managed.) So, that doesn't seem to be the causer, sorry.
Greg Shirey Ben E. Keith Company -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chase, John Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 10:49 AM > I don't see any example here that includes the > "(REPLACE" parm, so Larry Gray's advice to remove it sounds > reasonable. I've forwarded that, along with the other suggestions, to the programmer and am awaiting feedback. -jc- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
